00:00:01.340 - 00:00:25.620

Yeah. Yeah. I never saw any shooting are heard any shooting. I was sitting in our office building. You say you've heard nothing uh in in in regard to shooting or you heard no shooting? I heard no shooting. And uh did you see an officer shooting at

00:00:25.620 - 00:00:56.800

any time? No, I didn't to actively support that. That was a beautiful healthy. Yeah. When any death occurs as a consequence purely of an accident and misfortune, uh without any unlawful intent or without any undue negligence. This is called an excusable homicide. There's no crime attached

00:00:56.800 - 00:01:11.990

to this as far as the justifiable homicide is concerned, this has to do with where the shooting and they may have been intentional. Let us say as an officer defending himself and having to shoot the other person to do so to protect his life. This is

00:01:11.990 - 00:01:39.270

a justifiable homicide. I was not overly surprised at the verdict. I I presume that the verdict reflects the fact that the jurors heard all the evidence and this is how they this is the verdict they arrived at, and I will accept it as such. There has

00:01:39.270 - 00:01:49.470

been some question as to whether or not there's going to be a civil suit. Uh, in response to that, I would say this that I'm going to discuss it with my client advisor of the fact that this is her right to pursue it in the courts,

00:01:49.470 - 00:02:01.550

that she wanted that in a subsequent civil suit. Should there be one will be discussing whether or not the officer was negligent and whether or not this negligence caused her son's death, which is something a little bit different than what we do sought to determine. Here.

00:02:01.560 - 00:02:04.750

Here, we sought to determine whether there was any criminal responsibility.