00:00:01.240 - 00:00:21.350

housing in this particular area were for people who were moved out, houses were torn down and they all have certificates to move in when such houses already. And from what the people of that area and what everybody know now is that five families are moved in

00:00:22.130 - 00:00:40.220

and they say that it doesn't have any subscriptions, doesn't have any rights in this area sold. They have planned a meeting to discuss this with the fellow that's in charge. You were quoted as saying that the first order of business would be to get rid of

00:00:40.220 - 00:00:56.760

Montgomery and then get rid of these people who are allegedly in the housing illegally. What do you mean by that? Well, what I mean by that, if that Mr Montgomery is in full charge and he can't run in a carton to what the agreement in the

00:00:56.760 - 00:01:12.510

contract calls for this is the reason why you have to make the change. Now, if he's doing this legally, or if that's what the contract called for, fine, he stays there. But if not, we'll something would have to be done because if you don't you're gonna

00:01:12.520 - 00:01:38.960

tear up the whole program, it wouldn't be any need to get federal funds and other things to try and develop these areas. Why it's nothing that if you're gonna get the money, get the house and then still get somebody else from somewhere else. Mostly, thank you

00:01:41.040 - 00:02:01.180

of Mr Montgomery. Mr Montgomery. The man that the complaints are coming in on from the Western edition is also a coordinator of housing for two projects in Hunter's point. Uh do you think that this would cause trouble out there too? Well, I know it wouldn't be

00:02:01.180 - 00:02:13.550

nothing but trouble. If what he had done, it is not legal, and he does that. In Hunter's point, it'll be a complete failure of people to have all the houses out there. That's for sure.